Add Row 
Add 
CCRKBA Demands Transparency from Bloomberg on Epstein Connection
In a bold assertion, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) has issued a demand for billionaire and gun control advocate Michael Bloomberg to address his links to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The call comes on the heels of newly released documents revealing Bloomberg’s name prominently mentioned in correspondence related to Epstein’s notorious circle of powerful individuals.
Revelations Spark Outrage
A recent report from The Reload highlights that while Bloomberg’s mentions primarily relate to his news organization’s coverage, many emails suggest a more personal association with the infamous pair involved in trafficking. Emails indicated that Epstein and Maxwell often sought Bloomberg’s presence at exclusive gatherings and had contact with his aides, raising eyebrows about the depth of their relationship.
Bloomberg's Silence and CCRKBA's Response
CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb emphasized the need for clarity, stating, “He needs to be completely transparent regarding his relationship with Epstein and Maxwell.” No evidence has surfaced directly linking Bloomberg to Epstein’s activities or confirming whether he attended specific events with him or Maxwell. Nevertheless, the association itself is alarming enough for advocacy groups like the CCRKBA to demand action, especially from Everytown for Gun Safety, which Bloomberg co-founded.
Context: Gun Control Advocacy vs. Personal Conduct
This controversy unfolds against the backdrop of Bloomberg’s robust support for stricter gun control laws, as seen in past initiatives like the “Demand a Plan” campaign aimed at reducing gun violence in the U.S. His commitment to gun control faces scrutiny, now intertwined with questions of integrity and accountability that critics argue undermines his advocacy. If the tables were turned, Gottlieb noted, any link to gun rights activists would be sensationalized in the media.
The Public's Right to Know
In a pointed commentary, Gottlieb adds, “If there’s nothing to hide, Bloomberg shouldn’t be worried about clearing the air.” This sentiment reverberates among voters and constituents who seek to understand the motives behind Bloomberg’s political stances, especially in light of the extensive media coverage surrounding Epstein's criminal activities.
Looking Ahead: What This Means for Bloomberg and Gun Control
As the fallout from these revelations continues to unfold, the implications for Bloomberg could be significant. Facing increasing public scrutiny, he may need to navigate this crisis with care, balancing transparency while maintaining his influence in the gun control arena. Questions will linger about the intersection of his financial contributions to gun safety advocacy and his personal associations, with advocates calling for greater accountability from public figures.
As the CCRKBA urges Everytown to cease receiving funding from Bloomberg until clarity is provided, citizens remain on high alert for developments in this complicated web of power, money, and morality. This story is far from over and will likely evolve as more information becomes available.
Write A Comment