Add Row 
Add 
The Rebirth of 97Percent: A Shift in Strategy and Leadership
In recent months, the anti-gun nonprofit 97Percent has resurfaced, making headlines not just for its controversial stances but also for a significant shake-up in its leadership. Formerly led by Elizabeth Troye, an ex-advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, the organization now operates under the stewardship of Christopher Carita, a former police officer with a unique background. Notably, Carita's own efforts to secure a disability pension due to PTSD were denied, sparking debates about his credibility and expertise in advocating for red flag laws.
The Organization's Controversial Background
97Percent's name is derived from a now-debunked Quinnipiac poll suggesting that 97% of Americans supported mandatory background checks for gun purchases. Critics have long pointed out the inaccuracies of such polling methods, particularly the challenges in obtaining truthful responses from gun owners regarding their firearm status. This creates a perception that the organization is less focused on genuine dialogue between gun owners and non-gun owners, and more on promoting its own anti-gun agenda.
Understanding Red Flag Laws
Christopher Carita, in his new role, is a staunch advocate for what he terms Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), commonly known as red flag laws. These laws allow law enforcement to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others. While only 21 states currently have such laws, the push for broader implementation aligns with Carita's focus on community safety. However, critics argue that these laws could pose significant risks to due process and firearm rights.
Analysis of 97Percent's Agenda
Despite its claims of fostering collaboration between opposing viewpoints, research indicates that 97Percent's positions align more closely with typical anti-gun ideology. The organization openly supports a range of restrictive measures, including bans on assault weapons and standard-capacity magazines, which many gun owners view as infringing upon their Second Amendment rights. Moreover, their advocacy for mandatory storage laws raises concerns about potential police oversight in private homes.
The Broader Implications for Gun Rights
As 97Percent rebrands itself under Carita's leadership, the implications for gun rights in the U.S. cannot be understated. The group’s advisory board is stocked with individuals known for their hardline anti-gun stances, signaling a unified front against many of the freedoms associated with gun ownership. For those in the gun community, understanding the motivations and tactics of organizations like 97Percent is crucial in navigating the evolving landscape of gun rights and regulations.
What Comes Next for Gun Owners?
For gun owners and advocates, the resurgence of 97Percent may necessitate a deeper engagement with local and national discussions on gun legislation. Awareness of such groups can empower communities to better defend their rights and ensure that all voices—both pro-gun and anti-gun—are heard in policymaking processes. As debates surrounding gun control continue to intensify, it is vital for all stakeholders to stay informed and involved.
Sharing your stance, whether in support of stricter regulations or for preserving constitutional rights, can shape the future landscape of gun laws in the U.S. Engage with your local representatives and participate in community discussions to contribute your perspective in this ongoing dialogue.
Write A Comment